Home
Up

Universe Thinking

“There is a general principle that if one wishes to consider an area of activity and think about it, it helps to set it in the largest possible frame of reference.  If one can think of a system as embedded in another larger system, one can draw more accurate conclusions about it.  Some recent theorems in mathematics come down to this:  there are questions in any system that cannot be answered in that system.  If one embeds the system in a larger system, however, one can perhaps get an answer that will be useful.  Let us then back up, and instead of trying to talk first about immediate concerns, try to talk about the whole picture.” Harvey Jackins,  “The State of the Cosmos,” in The Upward Trend  (Rational Island Publishers, Seattle, 1977), p.1.

"Our human responsibility as one voice among so many throughout the universe is to develop our capacities to listen as incessantly as the hovering hydrogen atoms, as profoundly as our primal ancestors and their faithful descendants in today's indigenous peoples.  The adventure of the universe depends upon our capacity to listen."
Brian Swimme & Thomas Berry, The Universe Story (Harper 1992) p. 44
 

“Philosophy is written in this grand book the universe, which stands continually open to our gaze.   But the book cannot be understood unless one first learns to comprehend the language and to read the alphabet in which it is composed.”
Galileo Galilei from Galileo’s Daughter by Dava Sobel (Penguin 1999)
 

Over the past month or two I have been exposed anew to the universe story, the awesome unfolding of 15 billion years of evolution.   We stand in that stream, an ever-changing yet changeless drama that has made us all we are yet which we are only just beginning to understand.  My hope is that today we are on the verge of a new era in that drama, one where humans recognize their place among and not above other participants.   As we learn more, we recognize that we are part of a vast web of life stretching billions of light years beyond us and still expanding.    The vastness gives new perspective to the problems we face day to day in our own lives and societies.

  In Galileo’s time, the church was the most powerful institution of society.  Cathedrals stood taller than any other structures, monuments to a God whom all were called upon to worship within the orthodox theological and cosmological framework.   Galileo, using telescopes he made, observed that the Copernican view of the solar system was correct, that indeed the earth revolved around the sun.  In spite of his desire to remain a faithful Catholic, his observations challenged orthodoxy and threatened the church hierarchy to the extent that he was vehemently suspected of heresy and imprisoned by the church.

Today the church is no longer the most powerful institution having given way to the global casino on Wall Street.   Religious buildings are dwarfs compared with the vast financial buildings, corporations and consumer malls, the temples that express the spirit of global corporate capitalism.  The 400 years since the time of Galileo and the chartering of the British East India Company in 1600, have witnessed scientific and technological discoveries and evolving economic theory and practice that have enabled us to develop a vast economic system that now threatens to engulf the entire globe while destroying the very ecosystems necessary to sustain our lives.  

In the context of the universe, our modern, scientific age of consumerism is but a fleeting microsecond in time or speck of dust in space. If the age of the earth were one week beginning Sunday, the modern age would be the last twentieth of a second before midnight on Saturday.  In this microsecond we have lost touch with the very principles that give us life while speaking of economic development that will make our style of life universal on earth, developing a monoculture that rapidly devours traces of diversity.    This culture treats as heretics those who do not identify as consumers, whether by choice or exclusion. Even more, it widens the divide between those who have and those who do not.

What has happened to us, the most complex species to inhabit earth, to render us unable to remember our origins?  We are the species responsible for population levels that push the boundaries of earth’s carrying capacity; global warming and climate change that is melting Arctic and Antarctic ice; stratospheric ozone depletion that allows ultraviolet radiation to reach us at dangerous levels; an unprecedented loss of biological diversity; deforestation that cuts our capacity to use the sun’s energy through photosynthesis; desertification and land degradation that take away land available for food production;  freshwater loss and degradation that reduces availability of a vital life-giving substance;  marine environment and resource degradation pushing some fish species to the brink of extinction and  persistent organic pollutants found everywhere around the earth and known to be a radical threat to life.

What are the principles that have operated for billions of years to allow the complexity we experience today to evolve?    They are simple: differentiation, interiority and community.    Today’s economic monoculture denies each of these in fundamental ways.  It is inherently flawed and nearsighted when viewed from the universe perspective.  Our task is to wake up from our apathy and expand our horizons, recognizing and proclaiming the flaws and building alternatives that are consistent with models the universe has provided.

The questions before us are how to find ways to make the shift

+   From the quarterly statement to the seventh generation?

+   From reaction to global crisis to creative solutions for the future?

+   From local and product specific to global?

+   From partial and linear thinking to systemic thinking?

+   From mechanical models to living systems?

+   From justification of previous action to acknowledgement of present challenges?

+   From a polemical approach to dialogue?

+   From doing and having to being?

+   From a command and control mentality to building relationships?

+   From monoculture to diversity?

+   From atomistic individualism to community?

+ From materials and products to services?

+ From efficiency to effectiveness?

+ From exteriority to interiority?

+    From anthropocentrism to universe awareness?

+ From absorption with human creativity to biomimicry?

+ From isolation to interrelationship?

+ From talking to listening?

+ From objective to subjective?

Before the effect of our actions destroys the possibility of shifting course we have a choice.  The future is ours to create, but we must act in accord with the rhythms of our being as creatures of the universe.  We must examine the impact of our actions in every sphere of our lives, personal, communal and institutional.  We must find the generative flow of the universe and join in or it will wash us away.

Andy Smith
March 7, 2001

Top